The Secret
of their Success

After nearly 14 years and a recent personnel change, the St. Lawrence String Quartet is still adventurous, exciting, energetic —and just a little bit crazy.


by David Templeton

 

"Expect to be depressed," violinist Geoff Nuttall tells the audience while preparing to lead the St. Lawrence String Quartet in Shostakovich’s String Quartet No. 3 in F Major, Op. 73. "Most of you will probably want to leave," he adds, "because believe me—this piece is very, very depressing."

In spite of Nuttall’s tongue-in-cheek warnings nobody exits during the quartet’s riveting performance.

Perhaps it’s because the late-fall day is remarkably chilly outside and this free afternoon concert is being held within San Francisco State University’s spacious McKenna Theater, which is pleasantly heated. More likely, though, the audience remains intact because it already has experienced the ensemble’s opening interpretation of Haydn’s String Quartet in D Major, Op. 76, No. 5, and everyone recognizes the unlikeliness of SLSQ giving a "depressing" performance of anything, even Shostakovich’s legendarily brooding, war-inspired third quartet. Indeed, in spite of Nuttall’s comically dire forecasts, the majestic piece–as interpreted by the renowned Canadian quartet–is electrified with energy, emotion, and an almost-physical infusion of excitement.

Such is to be expected from the St. Lawrence String Quartet.

Founded in Toronto in 1989 and named for Canada’s mighty St. Lawrence River, the group has earned a reputation for being exciting, expressive, and entertainingly animated in a way one associates more often with rock groups than with classical quartets. Since 1999, the ensemble has been the quartet in residence at Stanford University.

Its repertoire consists of classical standards and a number of original works commissioned by such genre-jumping composers as Jonathan Berger and Melissa Hui. To date, the SLSQ has given over 1,500 performances around the world and recorded three critically acclaimed CDs. The Grammy-nominated Yiddishbbuk (EMI Classics, 573562), its latest, is a typically stirring recording—you could even call it shocking—and unleashes the intense emotional power of several pieces by Argentinean composer Osvaldo Golijov. A frequent SLSQ collaborator, Golijov has called his first meeting with the St. Lawrence a decade ago "a life changing experience."

The quartet now features first violinist Nuttall, 36, second violinist Barry Shiffman, 35, violist Lesley Robertson, 30-ish, and 29-year-old newcomer Alberto Parrini on cello. Parrini–who joined the quartet in August—has gracefully moved into the seat formerly occupied by founding member Marina Hoover, who has decided to stop touring to spend more time with her family. Hoover gave her final official performance with the quartet on August 11, 2002, at the Banff Centre for the Performing Arts in Calgary'—the exact spot where the group first formed almost 14 years earlier.

She will occasionally join her former cohorts as a guest performer at concerts close to home in Canada.

The McKenna Theater performance in San Francisco launches the quartet's 14th touring season, and Parrini is very much in command of his seat. The concert also marks Parrini's public debut with the St. Lawrence String Quartet. Throughout the performance, Nuttall's longish hair flies about and he nearly leaps from the chair as he plays, Robertson and Shiffman match Nuttall in their obvious enthusiasm for the music, and Parrini takes it all in with a constant expression of delighted surprise. By the time the group concludes with Tchaikovsky's String Quartet No. 1 in D Major, Op. 11, one thing is certain: The quartet may look a bit different, but there is no reason for anyone to be feeling depressed.

Lunch for Four

A few days later, the group's members ponder their recent transition, over lunch. "Things have definitely been different the last few months," says Shiffman, cracking open a plastic container crammed with fresh salad, "but after 14 years, different is probably a good thing."

The assembled quartet–Shiffman, Nuttall, Robertson, and Parrini—are taking a break in the sunny-but-not-very-warm upstairs lounge area of the Braun Music Center, on the campus of Stanford University. So far, the day has been packed with rehearsals, classes, and meetings. Their afternoon schedule promises more of the same. Casually attired—more so than usual—the group spends the first few minutes passing around sandwiches, raiding the refrigerator for drinks, and discussing Nuttall’s newly acquired violin—a 1770 J.B. Guadagnini, priced at $400,000—while playfully debating the possible existence of highly intelligent rodents skulking within the Braun building’s walls.

These people are very relaxed together, and well-practiced at the arts of teasing and contradiction. Even the newcomer Parrini is included in this group banter. Though noticeably more quiet than the others, he is clearly becoming acclimatized to his spot in the quartet. Before accepting the position with SLSQ, Parrini—born in Padua, Italy—was assistant principle cello with the Richmond Symphony in Virginia. The process that led to Parrini’s induction into the St. Lawrence String Quartet had begun months before, when the three founding musicians started auditioning cellists from around the world. In all, the quartet auditioned 15 cellists, all excellent players. It wasn't an easy process, and according to Nuttall, the hardest part was simply determining what it was they were actually looking for.

"There was a lot of serious discussion," he says. "It was very illuminating."

"Before we could articulate what it was we wanted," explains Shiffman, "we had to define what our group was about, something we never discussed before. Over the years, we had just evolved into whatever we were, and now we had to figure out what it is that makes us the St. Lawrence Quartet. 'Is it a sense of adventure? Or a sense of perfection?

"What is it?'"

So—a visiting journalist wants to know—what is it, then?

It was composer Golijov who solved the riddle of the SLSQ, arming the group with this exhortation: "Whoever you choose to replace Marina, make sure they're a little crazy," Shiffman laughs as he quotes their longtime friend and collaborator. "He was right. To be a comfortable fit with this quartet, someone would have to be willing to go a little nuts, to take risks, to be crazy."

"Craziness, we finally realized," grins Nuttall, "is a very important element in what we are."

With that in mind, they all agree, Parrini is a good fit.

"Alberto was one of the only candidates that showed that quality of improvisation and craziness," affirms Shiffman.

Parrini, when asked about those expressions of surprise and delight that appeared so often throughout the previous weekend’s performance, replies, "Oh, I’m surprised and delighted many times. So far, we’ve only performed a few times together, though we’ve rehearsed and rehearsed. But when we get on stage, everybody surprises me, musically, all the time. That’s been the most exciting thing."

"During the audition process," says Shiffman, "we were the ones who were surprised. He would do stuff that would just shock us. He made things up as he went along, and we were so set in our ways, we weren't always fast enough to catch it."

"Ultimately, it all came down to making certain choices," says Nuttall, "whether we really wanted someone because of their experience, someone who would come in already knowing everything backwards and forwards—or if we wanted someone with less experience but more flexibility."

"So, the main thing I have to give to this group," Parrini adds with a smile, "is my lack of experience—and being crazy."

Still, there are a couple of obvious elements from the original quartet that Parrini does not replicate. He is not a Canadian, and the St. Lawrence is a very Canadian ensemble, committed to showcasing contemporary composers from its homeland and often playing for a pittance to bring music to secluded concert halls in the provinces.

And by bringing another man into the quartet, SLSQ has skewed the balance to the male side. But according to Nuttall, Shiffman, and Robertson, there was no specific effort made to replace Hoover with another woman. During the search process, they auditioned an equal number of men and women.

"I think in any group there's a circus aspect to deal with," Robertson says. Citing the celebrated Ying Quartet—composed entirely of siblings, one sister and three brothers—Robertson says, "David Ying always talks about the ‘freak show’ aspect of a quartet of brothers and sister. Our ‘circus aspect’ was that we were all Canadian—and then the two-and-two thing. Well, Alberto’s a man, and he’s from Italy! So there goes our freak show. Oh well."

Haydn in the Dormitory

While the quartet has weathered a change in personnel, its mission remains unchanged. An important part of that mission is what SLSQ members call "outreach." And it hasn’t been easy. When it first set up shop at Stanford, the group immediately started doing on-campus concerts, usually attended by up to 600 enthusiastic fans—most from off campus.

"We are the 'ensemble in residence' at Stanford University," says Shiffman, "and our first responsibility has to be to speak to the students on campus. Unfortunately, that’s not who was showing up for a performance of classical music."

When initial outreach measures failed–such tactics as reducing or eliminating ticket prices for students–the quartet hit upon a typically radical notion. "The dorm life here is the center of the student experience," Nuttall says. "These are preassembled groups of 60–70 people. So we thought, 'Fine. We'll just go there and perform in the dorms.' So we started doing that, performing in the dorm living rooms, within touching length of the students—and it was amazing! The energy in that room, that first time, was just stunning. And not just stunning for them, but for us, the excitement we felt coming off that living room full of first-time classical listeners was really amazing."

The quartet has since performed a dozen or so such concerts, and the dorm concerts have actually led to an increase in student attendance at the official concert series.

"We had a great experience the other day," says Shiffman. "We were eating lunch in the cafeteria and this student came by—he's a local DJ for dances—and he recognized us from one of the dorm concerts. He said, 'Hey, ever since your concert, I've been trying to find all the Shostakovich quartets!’"

"He was very excited," laughs Nuttall, "about Shostakovich! It was great."

That word again: exciting. Aside from the word crazy, it's the most oft-repeated adjective of the day. Then again, creating excitement is what SLSQ seems determined to accomplish, deliberately opposing the common belief that classical music is, at its best, background music, soothing and relaxing, an oasis of calm in a busy world.

"I'm tired of the idea that classical music is soothing," says Shiffman. "People who say that should walk into the middle of a Beethoven quartet, a Bartók quartet, any number of pieces, and they'll see that classical music is not an oasis of calm. It's an oasis of life experience."

"When I want an oasis of calm, I put on a Coldplay CD," says Nuttall, referring to the popular British pop band. "But if I listen to Haydn, I get all worked up."

"Having classical music in the background," adds Robertson, "would be like having a dinner party while in the background there’s someone standing there reciting really great poetry—or like hanging a great work of art on your locker-room wall."

And, Nuttall adds, what classical music needs is more musicians willing to take more risks, to go a little crazy, all in order to show the inexperienced masses exactly how exciting this music can be—and already is.

"Joining a group can be a little like joining a cult," he laughs. "You can get sucked into the mind-set of, 'I have to play perfectly—or else I will die!' That can be really dangerous. Obviously, you want to be able to do everything right, you want to play flawlessly, you want to play perfectly together and in tune, blah blah blah—and that’s what our goal is—but along the way you have to make choices.

"Is it better to have some good stuff that's exciting, or to try for perfection and end up being boring? If you look at all the really great performers throughout history, rarely is someone remembered for playing perfectly. They are remembered because they're exciting!"


What SLSQ Plays

First violinist Geoff Nuttall plays the 1770 J.B. Guadagnini that he recently acquired. He uses several bows, including a W.E. Hill with fleur-de-lis. Barry Shiffman plays a restored Gioffredo Cappa, dating between 1680 and 1690 (making it the oldest instrument in the group). His primary bow was crafted by Canadian bow maker Michael Vann and commissioned for the 1992 Banff International String Quartet Competition. Lesley Robertson owns a "nonaristocratic" viola, made by John Newton of Desporo, Ontario, Canada, who used wood salvaged from a 19th-century factory. "It was either the viola or a 1985 Chevette," she says of her purchase. "It was a hard decision." Her bow is by Eugene Sartory. Alberto Parrini plays a composite cello from the Stanford instrument collection: body, scroll, and neck by Gilbetti, with a top replaced by Giuseppe Guarneri (filius Andrea). He uses a German-made bow by Egidius Dorfler.


Both Sides Now

"I think any string quartet should be forced to play the old dead guys," says Geoff Nuttall of the St. Lawrence String Quartet. "And the early music quartets should be forced to play modern stuff—because it can't be underestimated, the importance of being liberated by different musical experiences." The SLSQ, for the record, plays the dead guys and the new stuff, having made a name with its spirited presentations of works by Mozart, Bartók, and Haydn, along with original compositions by Osvaldo Golijov, Patrick Cardy, and Jonathan Berger. Why not focus on one or the other, either classical or modern? "[Doing both] frees us interpretively," explains Barry Shiffman. "When youÕre rehearsing Golijov—Dreams and Prayers, Yiddishbbuk, whateverÕs on your plate that dayÑit's so free and so exciting. And to bring that sense of freedom back to something like a Haydn quartet, then your experience with the dead guys will be that much fresher." Adds violist Lesley Robertson, "If you pay attention, new works and old works can inform one another by making you think, by making you stretch in your approach to a particular piece, because then you can use that knowledge when you approach a very different kind of piece. It's wonderful."


Photo of St. Lawrence String Quartet copyright by Eric H. Cheng.

Excerpted from Strings magazine, April, 2003, No. 109.


 Return to Top