Shop Talk
Preparing Your Instrument for
Historical Performance


by Sarah Freiberg
photographs by Daniel Larson


READ THE STORY
THIS PAGE

In recent decades, curious musicians have become interested in recreating the sounds of earlier eras. To get closer to bygone composers, they play on the instruments of those times, using techniques and styles the composers would have recognized. There are now established "period" orchestras, as well as college and graduate programs that specialize in historically informed performance. For readers who want to get their feet wet with historical performance, here is an explanation of the basic differences between Baroque and modern stringed instruments and bows, as well as how to "Baroque" an instrument and where to find ones ready to play.

The violin family appeared in Europe in the 16th century. While the first violins had only three strings, by 1550 they sported four, tuned as they are today. And by then the first of the illustrious Cremonese instrument makers, Andrea Amati, had begun crafting violins. Used initially in "violin bands" to accompany dances, the violin family of instruments became invaluable to the emerging musical genres of the 17th and 18th centuries: opera, concerto, sonata, and symphony.

Although the fundamental appearance of the violin and cello has not changed significantly in the ensuing centuries, the sound has. Originally designed for small performance venues, the instruments have been altered over the years to compete in today’s larger concert halls. Any older violin you come across has most likely been modernized to make it louder. This means that a newer neck, longer and thinner, has been grafted on at a steeper angle to the body of the violin. This sharper angling of the neck puts more tension on the strings, making the instrument sound brighter and bigger. In addition, the fittings, such as the bridge, fingerboard, and bass bar, have become more substantial.

The most obvious changes to the sound over the centuries, however, have to do with the materials of the strings and the development of the modern bow. Until well into the 20th century, violin strings were made primarily of sheep’s gut. Initially, all four strings were made of pure gut, which meant that the lower strings were particularly thick. A breakthrough came in the mid-17th century with the development of covered strings, which had a core of gut fitted with windings of metal. This allowed strings to be less cumbersome and quicker speaking, and by the late 17th century, violists and cellists used covered G and C strings, and violinists had switched to covered G strings. Plain gut E, A, and D strings persisted well into the 20th century, but eventually the commercial manufacturing of metal strings made them practically obsolete.

If you are used to the ease and reliability of metal strings, it may take a bit of adjustment to get accustomed to gut strings. Gut strings produce a sweet, rich, intimate sound and are very responsive, but they are also sensitive to variations in pressure and placement of the bow on the string. If you bear down too forcefully with the bow or play too close to the fingerboard or bridge, you may get an unwelcome squawk from a gut string. They are also sensitive to changes in temperature and humidity and may require frequent tuning (but don’t bother with fine tuners—they don’t work well with gut strings). The thinner E and A strings wear out more rapidly than metal strings, and need to be changed more frequently.

Bows have been modified through the centuries as well. At first there was little standardization; bows varied by function and locale until François Tourte developed the modern bow in the late 18th century. In general, early bow sticks curved outward, echoing the curve of the bridge and looking more like actual arrow-shooting bows. The first dance-band bows were very short and light, and had clip-in frogs. Later bows tended to be somewhat longer and featured a screw mechanism to tighten and loosen the bow hair, which was developed by 1700. Baroque bows had less hair and less tension then their modern counterparts. They were also weighted quite differently. As a result, they did not have the sustaining capabilities of today’s bows, and the sound naturally decreased when the bow was drawn from frog to tip. However, Baroque bows were perfectly suited to making quick, short strokes and allowed for a great variety in articulation.

Bows are neither as hardy as violins nor as adaptable. Although an old violin can be modernized, a Baroque bow cannot. Original Baroque bows are rarely found in playing condition; the few that survive are in museums. You may occasionally run across a "transitional" bow, particularly at auctions—these are the result of mid–18th–century makers’ experiments with new bow styles. They curve inward and resemble modern bows more than Baroque ones. Although they still do not have as much hair as their modern counterparts, they produce a more even sound from frog to tip than Baroque bows, and they bounce easily. These bows are perfect for the music of Haydn, Mozart, and their contemporaries.

You may have noticed that there was little uniformity early on. This is partially because people and places were somewhat more isolated than today. Bow holds were no exception: in 17th- and 18th-century France, violinists could place their thumbs on the hair, on the frog, or under the frog. The Italian hold placed the thumb on the stick. The way violinists held their instruments varied widely as well.

Renaissance and Baroque paintings that portray musicians show various violin positions: some musicians hold their instruments on their chests, while others rest them on their collarbones. Cellists did not have the advantage of the modern endpin; they were pictured resting the cello on their legs, or occasionally on a box or on the floor. You’ll also notice that there were no aids for holding up the violins; chin rests and shoulder rests are much later inventions. Today’s performers on Baroque-style violins also vary their holds considerably. Many use a soft cloth, like a chamois, to tuck around the violin, for neck comfort and to keep the instrument from slipping. Some violinists rest their chins on one side or the other of the tailpiece; others prefer to rest directly on it. Still others go "chinless," and many players of very early violin music rest their instruments on their chests.

If you try to play without chin and shoulder rests, you will find that your left hand has more of a role in holding up the violin. It can be a challenge to shift—particularly to shift down from an upper position. You may find the violin slipping away from you as your hand shifts down. In this case, it is best to keep the thumb in place, while moving your fingers to the new position. Once you have reached the new position, your thumb can follow the fingers. Without the hardware, you’ll find it much harder to vibrate; not to worry, though, since vibrato was used sparingly as a kind of ornament for special effects.

Pitch today is much the same everywhere; an "A" is uniformly recognized to be 440 hz. Before the 20th century, there was no standard; pitch varied from city to city—even within a town. An "A" could be as high as 465 hz., or as low as 392 hz., more like a G to modern ears. (We know this from fixed-pitch instruments such as organs and wind instruments.) While string instruments were more adaptable, their players also had to be flexible and became quite adept at transposition. Today, some performers on early instruments vary their basic pitch depending on the repertoire. For practical reasons, though, most of the larger groups have agreed on a standard pitch for Baroque-era music of 415 hz. for A. This sounds like a G<#> to modern ears. For Classical-era music, the standard is an A at 430 hz.

If you want to get a sense of what it’s like to play a Baroque instrument, put gut strings on yours and try out a Baroque bow. Tune the instrument down a half-step as well. The lower tension of the gut strings tuned down, as well as the bow, can teach you a great deal about the style. With gut strings, you will find that you can’t bear down very much; you really have to coax the sound out by pulling to the side. One instrument maker told me that the strings and the bow account for as much as 90 percent of the difference in sound between Baroque and modern instruments.

If you are interested in pursuing Baroque playing further, you will find that there are many excellent instrument and bow makers who specialize in modern copies of early instruments. If you have an older violin that you want to have "re-Baroqued," take it to an instrument maker who works with such instruments. You will find that it needs a shorter, straighter neck, a shorter, lighter fingerboard, and a thinner bridge, bass-bar, and tailpiece. But you won’t need your chin rest, shoulder rest, or endpin!

Click here to see the photo essay.

To see some wonderful examples of Baroque violins made by Daniel Larson, the photographer of this series, visit www.daniellarson.com.

Excerpted from Strings magazine, May/June 2001, No. 94

 


 Return to Top